Benchmark Watch: July 2026
Three new SaaS benchmark reports landed this quarter: KeyBanc’s 16th Annual Private SaaS Company Survey, High Alpha’s 2025 SaaS Benchmarks (High Alpha now stewards the old OpenView benchmark lineage), and the Benchmarkit × Aleph 2026 SaaS and AI Performance Benchmarks. Two signals worth your attention this month.
CAC paybacks keep compressing
Benchmarkit × Aleph puts the 2026 median CAC payback at 16 months (198 of the 342 companies surveyed reported the metric, on 2025 actuals), with the top quartile at 6 months or faster and the bottom quartile past 24. KeyBanc’s newest survey, over 400 private SaaS companies with a median ARR around $45M, puts the median at roughly 18 months on 2024 actuals, down from about 24 months in its 2023 edition, with a top quartile of 12 months. High Alpha’s cut for the $1M to $5M ARR bracket comes in lower, at an 8 month median.
Checked against our baseline, a rolling meta-analysis of published benchmark studies (KeyBanc, High Alpha, Benchmarkit, AppsFlyer, and roughly fifteen others), the published bands hold: 6 to 12 months for SMB and self-serve, 12 to 24 months for enterprise. What moved is where you sit inside them. An 18 month payback that read as healthy in 2022 is now just average. Twelve months, once merely strong, is the new top quartile line for enterprise deals.
Two more numbers held without needing a second look this scan. Benchmarkit × Pavilion’s 2025 dataset (1,600+ companies) puts median LTV:CAC at 3.6:1, comfortably mid band on our 3:1 to 5:1 range. AppsFlyer’s State of Subscriptions 2026 report (1.7 billion paid installs, 2,900 apps) puts cross category retention at 26% on Day-1, 11% on Day-7, and 5.4% on Day-30, consistent with our consumer ranges; subscription specific apps run higher, around 14% on Day-30.
A retention number that needs its definition checked first
Mixpanel’s State of Digital Analytics 2026 report, built from 577 billion B2B events, publishes a North America “one-week retention” figure of 5.0% (APAC 8.3%). Read on its own, that number would blow straight through our B2B Day-7 band of 40% to 60%. Read the definition before you panic.
The same report also publishes a separate “weekly retention” metric at 44.6% to 77.9%, which sits far closer to what most B2B teams already see in their own data. Two metrics with near identical names measuring different things is a known trap in analytics reporting, not evidence that Mixpanel got it wrong. Until the exact definition behind “one-week retention” is confirmed against the day-7 cohort measure the consensus baseline uses, we are holding our number rather than moving it on a single headline figure.
The consensus baseline holds
Nothing in this scan changes our published ranges. Three new CAC payback studies confirm the bands and sharpen what counts as strong inside them. One retention headline gets flagged, not adopted, until its definition is confirmed. That is the job of a maintained baseline: not reacting to every new report, but weighing each one against what came before and telling you when something has actually moved.
See where your own numbers land against the consensus baseline. Check your numbers against the baseline → benchmark.scilla.studio. Two minutes, no signup.
See where your numbers actually land
Plot your retention, CAC payback, LTV:CAC and K-factor against the B2B and Consumer bands, and find out whether a good-looking number is real or sitting on a leaky retention curve.
Run the free diagnosis →